Compare Anbernic RG353V (83×126×21 mm, 3.5" 4:3) vs AYN Odin 2 Mini (198×85.8×19.5 mm, 5" 16:9) side-by-side at true 1:1 millimeter scale.
Silhouettes and screens to true relative scale (mm). Inner rectangle represents the physical screen.
Anbernic RG353V
Panel 4:3 with native resolution 640x480.
AYN Odin 2 Mini
Panel 16:9 with native resolution 1920x1080.
Physical Dimensions & Thickness: The Anbernic RG353V has a vertical (game boy style) chassis measuring 83 × 126 × 21 mm, while the AYN Odin 2 Mini uses a horizontal bar chassis measuring 198 × 85.8 × 19.5 mm. In width, the Anbernic RG353V is 115 mm (58.1%) narrower than the AYN Odin 2 Mini. In height, the Anbernic RG353V is 40.2 mm (46.9%) taller than the AYN Odin 2 Mini. In chassis thickness (depth), the Anbernic RG353V is 1.5 mm (7.7%) thicker than the AYN Odin 2 Mini (21 mm vs 19.5 mm).
Footprint Area & Weight: Calculating surface footprint (width × height), the Anbernic RG353V occupies 10,458 mm² (104.6 cm²), compared to 16,988 mm² (169.9 cm²) for the AYN Odin 2 Mini—a footprint difference of 6,530 mm² (38.4%). On the scale, the Anbernic RG353V weighs 180g versus 320g for the AYN Odin 2 Mini, representing a 140g (43.8%) weight difference (Anbernic RG353V is lighter).
4:3 vs 16:9 Effective Viewable Screen Size: For classic 4:3 retro games (PS1, SNES, N64, Dreamcast), the Anbernic RG353V's 3.5" (4:3) panel yields a 3.5" effective diagonal (100% full screen without black bars (native 4:3)), while the AYN Odin 2 Mini's 5" (16:9) panel yields a 4.09" effective diagonal (75% active screen area with vertical pillarbox bars on the sides (native 16:9)). This gives the AYN Odin 2 Mini a 0.59" larger active 4:3 diagonal (36.2% more active display area). For 16:9 widescreen content (PSP, Switch, streaming), the Anbernic RG353V delivers a 3.21" effective diagonal (75% screen usage) versus 5" (100% screen usage) on the AYN Odin 2 Mini, making the AYN Odin 2 Mini larger by 1.79" (+142.2% active 16:9 area).
| Specification | Anbernic RG353V | AYN Odin 2 Mini | Difference / Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (W × H × D) | 83 × 126 × 21 mm | 198 × 85.8 × 19.5 mm | Anbernic RG353V is 33.7% smaller by volume |
| Width | 83 mm | 198 mm | 115 mm (58.1% vs Odin 2 Mini) |
| Height | 126 mm | 85.8 mm | 40.2 mm (46.9% vs Odin 2 Mini) |
| Thickness (Depth) | 21 mm | 19.5 mm | 1.5 mm (7.7% vs Odin 2 Mini) |
| Footprint Area (W × H) | 10,458 mm² (104.6 cm²) | 16,988 mm² (169.9 cm²) | 6,530 mm² (38.4% diff) |
| Chassis Volume | 219.6 cm³ | 331.3 cm³ | 111.7 cm³ (33.7% diff) |
| Weight | 180 g | 320 g | 140 g (43.8% diff) |
| Form Factor | Vertical (Game Boy style) | Horizontal Bar | Vertical (Game Boy style) vs Horizontal Bar |
| Native Screen Diagonal | 3.5" | 5" | 1.5" (42.9% larger on Odin 2 Mini) |
| Native Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 16:9 | 4:3 vs 16:9 |
| Display Technology | IPS | IPS | Both IPS |
| Native Resolution & Density | 640x480 (229 PPI) | 1920x1080 (441 PPI) | 212 PPI sharper on Odin 2 Mini |
| Effective 4:3 Screen Size (PS1, SNES, N64) | 3.5" (100% native, no bars) | 4.09" (75% area, pillarbox) | +0.59" (+36.2% area) on Odin 2 Mini |
| Effective 16:9 Screen Size (PSP, Streaming) | 3.21" (75% area, letterbox) | 5" (100% native, no bars) | +1.79" (+142.2% area) on Odin 2 Mini |
| Effective 3:2 Screen Size (Game Boy Advance) | 3.37" (89% area, letterbox) | 4.42" (84% area, pillarbox) | +1.05" (+72.4% area) on Odin 2 Mini |
| Processor (SoC / CPU) | RockChip RK3566 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (Source) | Different architecture |
| Memory (RAM) | 2 GB LPDDR4 | 8 GB / 12 GB LPDDR5X | 2 GB LPDDR4 vs 8 GB / 12 GB LPDDR5X |
| Battery Capacity | 3,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh | 1,800 mAh larger on Odin 2 Mini |
| Operating System | Android 11 / Linux (ArkOS) | Android 13 | Android 11 / Linux (ArkOS) vs Android 13 |
The Anbernic RG353V measures 83 × 126 × 21 mm (footprint: 10,458 mm² / 104.6 cm²), whereas the AYN Odin 2 Mini measures 198 × 85.8 × 19.5 mm (footprint: 16,988 mm² / 169.9 cm²). Compared to the AYN Odin 2 Mini, the Anbernic RG353V is 115 mm (58.1%) narrower, 40.2 mm (46.9%) taller, 1.5 mm (7.7%) thicker, and 6,530 mm² (38.4%) smaller in footprint area. In weight, the Anbernic RG353V is 140g (43.8%) lighter (180g vs 320g).
The AYN Odin 2 Mini delivers a larger active 4:3 image by 0.59" diagonal (36.2% more active display area) than the Anbernic RG353V. Specifically, the Anbernic RG353V has a 3.5" 4:3 IPS screen (640x480) that yields a 3.5" effective 4:3 diagonal (100% full screen without black bars (native 4:3)). The AYN Odin 2 Mini has a 5" 16:9 IPS screen (1920x1080) that yields a 4.09" effective 4:3 diagonal (75% active screen area with vertical pillarbox bars on the sides (native 16:9)).
For 16:9 widescreen gaming (PSP, Switch, and game streaming), the AYN Odin 2 Mini provides a larger viewable image at 5" effective diagonal compared to 3.21" on the Anbernic RG353V (+1.79", or 142.2% more active widescreen area). On 16:9 content, the Anbernic RG353V operates at 75% active screen area with horizontal letterbox bars on top and bottom (native 4:3), while the AYN Odin 2 Mini operates at 100% full screen without black bars (native 16:9).
Yes, the Anbernic RG353V is more compact and pocketable than the AYN Odin 2 Mini, with a smaller overall chassis volume (219.6 cm³ vs 331.3 cm³). The Anbernic RG353V uses a vertical (game boy style) form factor (83 mm wide × 21 mm thick, 180g), whereas the AYN Odin 2 Mini uses a horizontal bar form factor (198 mm wide × 19.5 mm thick, 320g). Overall, the Anbernic RG353V is easier to carry in a pocket due to its smaller physical footprint.
Explore how these handhelds compare against other popular emulation models.
