Compare Anbernic RG35XXSP (89×158×27.3 mm, 3.5" 4:3) vs Miyoo Mini Plus (78.5×108×22.3 mm, 3.5" 4:3) side-by-side at true 1:1 millimeter scale.
Silhouettes and screens to true relative scale (mm). Inner rectangle represents the physical screen.
Anbernic RG35XXSP
Panel 4:3 with native resolution 640x480.
Miyoo Mini Plus
Panel 4:3 with native resolution 640x480.
Physical Dimensions & Thickness: The Anbernic RG35XXSP has a clamshell (foldable) chassis measuring 89 × 158 × 27.3 mm, while the Miyoo Mini Plus uses a vertical (game boy style) chassis measuring 78.5 × 108 × 22.3 mm. In width, the Anbernic RG35XXSP is 10.5 mm (13.4%) wider than the Miyoo Mini Plus. In height, the Anbernic RG35XXSP is 50 mm (46.3%) taller than the Miyoo Mini Plus. In chassis thickness (depth), the Anbernic RG35XXSP is 5 mm (22.4%) thicker than the Miyoo Mini Plus (27.3 mm vs 22.3 mm).
Footprint Area & Weight: Calculating surface footprint (width × height), the Anbernic RG35XXSP occupies 14,062 mm² (140.6 cm²), compared to 8,478 mm² (84.8 cm²) for the Miyoo Mini Plus—a footprint difference of 5,584 mm² (65.9%). On the scale, the Anbernic RG35XXSP weighs 197g versus 162g for the Miyoo Mini Plus, representing a 35g (21.6%) weight difference (Miyoo Mini Plus is lighter).
4:3 vs 16:9 Effective Viewable Screen Size: For classic 4:3 retro games (PS1, SNES, N64, Dreamcast), the Anbernic RG35XXSP's 3.5" (4:3) panel yields a 3.5" effective diagonal (100% full screen without black bars (native 4:3)), while the Miyoo Mini Plus's 3.5" (4:3) panel yields a 3.5" effective diagonal (100% full screen without black bars (native 4:3)). Both devices provide the exact same viewable 4:3 image size. For 16:9 widescreen content (PSP, Switch, streaming), the Anbernic RG35XXSP delivers a 3.21" effective diagonal (75% screen usage) versus 3.21" (75% screen usage) on the Miyoo Mini Plus.
| Specification | Anbernic RG35XXSP | Miyoo Mini Plus | Difference / Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (W × H × D) | 89 × 158 × 27.3 mm | 78.5 × 108 × 22.3 mm | Miyoo Mini Plus is 50.7% smaller by volume |
| Width | 89 mm | 78.5 mm | 10.5 mm (13.4% vs Mini Plus) |
| Height | 158 mm | 108 mm | 50 mm (46.3% vs Mini Plus) |
| Thickness (Depth) | 27.3 mm | 22.3 mm | 5 mm (22.4% vs Mini Plus) |
| Footprint Area (W × H) | 14,062 mm² (140.6 cm²) | 8,478 mm² (84.8 cm²) | 5,584 mm² (65.9% diff) |
| Chassis Volume | 383.9 cm³ | 189.1 cm³ | 194.8 cm³ (103% diff) |
| Weight | 197 g | 162 g | 35 g (21.6% diff) |
| Form Factor | Clamshell (Foldable) | Vertical (Game Boy style) | Clamshell (Foldable) vs Vertical (Game Boy style) |
| Native Screen Diagonal | 3.5" | 3.5" | Same diagonal |
| Native Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 | Identical 4:3 ratio |
| Display Technology | IPS | IPS | Both IPS |
| Native Resolution & Density | 640x480 (229 PPI) | 640x480 (229 PPI) | Same pixel density (229 PPI) |
| Effective 4:3 Screen Size (PS1, SNES, N64) | 3.5" (100% native, no bars) | 3.5" (100% native, no bars) | Tied at 3.5" |
| Effective 16:9 Screen Size (PSP, Streaming) | 3.21" (75% area, letterbox) | 3.21" (75% area, letterbox) | Tied at 3.21" |
| Effective 3:2 Screen Size (Game Boy Advance) | 3.37" (89% area, letterbox) | 3.37" (89% area, letterbox) | Tied at 3.37" |
| Processor (SoC / CPU) | Allwinner H700 | SigmaStar SSD202D | Different architecture |
| Memory (RAM) | 1 GB LPDDR4 | 128 MB DDR3 | 1 GB LPDDR4 vs 128 MB DDR3 |
| Battery Capacity | 3,300 mAh | 3,000 mAh | 300 mAh larger on RG35XXSP |
| Operating System | Linux | Linux (OnionOS, MinUI) | Linux vs Linux (OnionOS, MinUI) |
The Anbernic RG35XXSP measures 89 × 158 × 27.3 mm (footprint: 14,062 mm² / 140.6 cm²), whereas the Miyoo Mini Plus measures 78.5 × 108 × 22.3 mm (footprint: 8,478 mm² / 84.8 cm²). Compared to the Miyoo Mini Plus, the Anbernic RG35XXSP is 10.5 mm (13.4%) wider, 50 mm (46.3%) taller, 5 mm (22.4%) thicker, and 5,584 mm² (65.9%) larger in footprint area. In weight, the Anbernic RG35XXSP is 35g (21.6%) heavier (197g vs 162g).
Both the Anbernic RG35XXSP and Miyoo Mini Plus produce the exact same 3.5" effective 4:3 viewable diagonal. Specifically, the Anbernic RG35XXSP has a 3.5" 4:3 IPS screen (640x480) that yields a 3.5" effective 4:3 diagonal (100% full screen without black bars (native 4:3)). The Miyoo Mini Plus has a 3.5" 4:3 IPS screen (640x480) that yields a 3.5" effective 4:3 diagonal (100% full screen without black bars (native 4:3)).
For 16:9 widescreen gaming, both devices provide an identical 3.21" effective diagonal image. On 16:9 content, the Anbernic RG35XXSP operates at 75% active screen area with horizontal letterbox bars on top and bottom (native 4:3), while the Miyoo Mini Plus operates at 75% active screen area with horizontal letterbox bars on top and bottom (native 4:3).
No, the Miyoo Mini Plus is more compact and pocketable than the Anbernic RG35XXSP, with a smaller overall chassis volume (189.1 cm³ vs 383.9 cm³). The Anbernic RG35XXSP uses a clamshell (foldable) form factor (89 mm wide × 27.3 mm thick, 197g), whereas the Miyoo Mini Plus uses a vertical (game boy style) form factor (78.5 mm wide × 22.3 mm thick, 162g). Overall, the Miyoo Mini Plus is easier to carry in a pocket due to its slimmer 22.3 mm profile and smaller physical footprint.
Explore how these handhelds compare against other popular emulation models.
