Compare AYN Odin 2 (225×98×17 mm, 6" 16:9) vs Miyoo A30 (127.5×57×16 mm, 2.8" 4:3) side-by-side at true 1:1 millimeter scale.
Silhouettes and screens to true relative scale (mm). Inner rectangle represents the physical screen.
AYN Odin 2
Panel 16:9 with native resolution 1920x1080.
Miyoo A30
Panel 4:3 with native resolution 640x480.
Physical Dimensions & Thickness: The AYN Odin 2 has a horizontal bar chassis measuring 225 × 98 × 17 mm, while the Miyoo A30 uses a horizontal bar chassis measuring 127.5 × 57 × 16 mm. In width, the AYN Odin 2 is 97.5 mm (76.5%) wider than the Miyoo A30. In height, the AYN Odin 2 is 41 mm (71.9%) taller than the Miyoo A30. In chassis thickness (depth), the AYN Odin 2 is 1 mm (6.3%) thicker than the Miyoo A30 (17 mm vs 16 mm).
Footprint Area & Weight: Calculating surface footprint (width × height), the AYN Odin 2 occupies 22,050 mm² (220.5 cm²), compared to 7,268 mm² (72.7 cm²) for the Miyoo A30—a footprint difference of 14,782 mm² (203.4%). On the scale, the AYN Odin 2 weighs 420g versus 115g for the Miyoo A30, representing a 305g (265.2%) weight difference (Miyoo A30 is lighter).
4:3 vs 16:9 Effective Viewable Screen Size: For classic 4:3 retro games (PS1, SNES, N64, Dreamcast), the AYN Odin 2's 6" (16:9) panel yields a 4.9" effective diagonal (75% active screen area with vertical pillarbox bars on the sides (native 16:9)), while the Miyoo A30's 2.8" (4:3) panel yields a 2.8" effective diagonal (100% full screen without black bars (native 4:3)). This gives the AYN Odin 2 a 2.1" larger active 4:3 diagonal (206.5% more active display area). For 16:9 widescreen content (PSP, Switch, streaming), the AYN Odin 2 delivers a 6" effective diagonal (100% screen usage) versus 2.57" (75% screen usage) on the Miyoo A30, making the AYN Odin 2 larger by 3.43" (+445% active 16:9 area).
| Specification | AYN Odin 2 | Miyoo A30 | Difference / Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (W × H × D) | 225 × 98 × 17 mm | 127.5 × 57 × 16 mm | Miyoo A30 is 69% smaller by volume |
| Width | 225 mm | 127.5 mm | 97.5 mm (76.5% vs A30) |
| Height | 98 mm | 57 mm | 41 mm (71.9% vs A30) |
| Thickness (Depth) | 17 mm | 16 mm | 1 mm (6.3% vs A30) |
| Footprint Area (W × H) | 22,050 mm² (220.5 cm²) | 7,268 mm² (72.7 cm²) | 14,782 mm² (203.4% diff) |
| Chassis Volume | 374.9 cm³ | 116.3 cm³ | 258.6 cm³ (222.4% diff) |
| Weight | 420 g | 115 g | 305 g (265.2% diff) |
| Form Factor | Horizontal Bar | Horizontal Bar | Both Horizontal Bar |
| Native Screen Diagonal | 6" | 2.8" | 3.2" (114.3% larger on Odin 2) |
| Native Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 4:3 | 16:9 vs 4:3 |
| Display Technology | IPS | IPS | Both IPS |
| Native Resolution & Density | 1920x1080 (367 PPI) | 640x480 (286 PPI) | 81 PPI sharper on Odin 2 |
| Effective 4:3 Screen Size (PS1, SNES, N64) | 4.9" (75% area, pillarbox) | 2.8" (100% native, no bars) | +2.1" (+206.5% area) on Odin 2 |
| Effective 16:9 Screen Size (PSP, Streaming) | 6" (100% native, no bars) | 2.57" (75% area, letterbox) | +3.43" (+445% area) on Odin 2 |
| Effective 3:2 Screen Size (Game Boy Advance) | 5.3" (84% area, pillarbox) | 2.69" (89% area, letterbox) | +2.61" (+288% area) on Odin 2 |
| Processor (SoC / CPU) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Allwinner A33 | Different architecture |
| Memory (RAM) | 8 GB / 12 GB / 16 GB LPDDR5X | 512 MB (Source) | 8 GB / 12 GB / 16 GB LPDDR5X vs 512 MB (Source) |
| Battery Capacity | 8,000 mAh | 2,600 mAh | 5,400 mAh larger on Odin 2 |
| Operating System | Android 13 | Linux (Tina) | Android 13 vs Linux (Tina) |
The AYN Odin 2 measures 225 × 98 × 17 mm (footprint: 22,050 mm² / 220.5 cm²), whereas the Miyoo A30 measures 127.5 × 57 × 16 mm (footprint: 7,268 mm² / 72.7 cm²). Compared to the Miyoo A30, the AYN Odin 2 is 97.5 mm (76.5%) wider, 41 mm (71.9%) taller, 1 mm (6.3%) thicker, and 14,782 mm² (203.4%) larger in footprint area. In weight, the AYN Odin 2 is 305g (265.2%) heavier (420g vs 115g).
The AYN Odin 2 delivers a larger active 4:3 image by 2.1" diagonal (206.5% more active display area) than the Miyoo A30. Specifically, the AYN Odin 2 has a 6" 16:9 IPS screen (1920x1080) that yields a 4.9" effective 4:3 diagonal (75% active screen area with vertical pillarbox bars on the sides (native 16:9)). The Miyoo A30 has a 2.8" 4:3 IPS screen (640x480) that yields a 2.8" effective 4:3 diagonal (100% full screen without black bars (native 4:3)).
For 16:9 widescreen gaming (PSP, Switch, and game streaming), the AYN Odin 2 provides a larger viewable image at 6" effective diagonal compared to 2.57" on the Miyoo A30 (+3.43", or 445% more active widescreen area). On 16:9 content, the AYN Odin 2 operates at 100% full screen without black bars (native 16:9), while the Miyoo A30 operates at 75% active screen area with horizontal letterbox bars on top and bottom (native 4:3).
No, the Miyoo A30 is more compact and pocketable than the AYN Odin 2, with a smaller overall chassis volume (116.3 cm³ vs 374.9 cm³). The AYN Odin 2 uses a horizontal bar form factor (225 mm wide × 17 mm thick, 420g), whereas the Miyoo A30 uses a horizontal bar form factor (127.5 mm wide × 16 mm thick, 115g). Overall, the Miyoo A30 is easier to carry in a pocket due to its slimmer 16 mm profile and smaller physical footprint.
Explore how these handhelds compare against other popular emulation models.
